The fight for a free and prosperous nation means
understanding the words and meanings used to secure your vote. It is also
important to look at the results and consequences of implementing policies that
are often sold using deceptive labels.
“Community” is the term often used by the left as a tool to
support big government. “We are stronger together than we are separate” is one
of the many variations of the mantra they use to equate a good quality with a big
government fix. Communities can be a source of good but only in the sense that
the community is organically created and not contrived. For example, a church
community is a community made up of people voluntarily coming together to
worship and support people of need through the programs they create- like
donating time, food, and shelter in a crisis.
The “global community” on the other hand is a very dangerous
community to accept or become a part of. This fictitious community is used to
garner good feeling about friendliness and holding hands and common causes we
share. The most common use of “global community” is the extreme environmentalist
groups that are really a conglomerate of groups that hate capitalism and freedom.
The major problem with this “community” is there are no mutual common goals any
of us share. We may think the world wants clean air and water for example but
all you have to do is visit China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, and you
understand this is not true. Most non capitalist countries are the most
egregious polluters in the world. The governments that are the most dictorial
and not democratic are the biggest polluters in the world, and we are lead to believe
we all share a common future. We don’t. So when people try to sell an idea by
playing to your sense of “global community” there is no such community. As a
famous politician once said, “all politics is local.” This same concept should
be applied to “communities” as well.
Any government supported “community’ is compulsory and is a
danger to our freedom and prosperity. The healthcare debacle that was just
deemed constitutional is being argued that it is good for Americans because it takes
care of the poor, minority, uninsured, place the group here “community.” The
problem is it destroys the individual. Government “communities” impose their
will, rules and regulations on every individual, and we can’t escape the
government community. So in reality it is not a community but a prison.
“Fairness” is another term often leveraged by the big
government types to implement more government agencies to decide what is fair
for everyone. So, what is fair for everyone? Should we all make the same amount
of money no matter what our job is? What is a fair wage? Is it fair that some
people live in a bigger home? Own a boat? Own a business? What is a fair? And
most important who decides?
“The “rich” should be made to pay their fair share.” What is
the fair share? Who decides what is rich? Is $30K, $50K, $75K, $100K, etc…
rich? For someone making minimum wage $75K may seem rich but who are they to
decide? You see it all becomes arbitrary and someone must decide the rules. Is
that the government “community”? Is it fair to tax a man more because he works
harder and becomes more successful? If we continue to tax success will we get
more or less of it?
It can all seem fair as long as you are not targeted by the “fairness
community.” That is why the constitution, capitalism, and the free markets are
so effective. The constitution protects the individual from oppressive government.
Capitalism rewards individuals who work hard and success is subject to the laws
of the market. The market is colorblind, gender blind, sexuality blind, and has
no interest in your title, resume, or past accomplishments. It is a mechanism
that holds the individual or company accountable to their customers every day.
There is no government bureaucrat picking winners and losers based on politics.
Hard work, merit, reputation, and quality drive success. You can’t legislate
success no matter how much you want to help others. Individuals must choose to
be successful, communities can’t impose it.
Community and fairness can sound really good but they don’t
work in the context of government. What is so hard to understand?